{"id":135,"date":"2014-01-14T14:16:54","date_gmt":"2014-01-14T12:16:54","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ozanyarman.com\/wpress\/?page_id=135"},"modified":"2014-02-16T10:43:09","modified_gmt":"2014-02-16T08:43:09","slug":"eternity-paradoxes","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/ozanyarman.com\/wpress\/eternity-paradoxes\/","title":{"rendered":"Eternity Paradoxes"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>-Eternity Paradoxes by Dr. Oz.-<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>1. If the universe was timeless, all matter would have dissipated into space an eternity ago\u00a0due to the 2nd law of Thermodynamics in action, resulting in the maximization of entropy,\u00a0hence, complete saturation of all available energy. This would be so regardless of infinite\u00a0matter, given that space must be of a greater degree of infinity in order to allow matter to\u00a0roam in it\u00a0(cf. &#8220;<a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Heat_death_paradox\" target=\"_blank\">Heat Death Paradox<\/a>&#8220;).<\/p>\n<p>2. If the universe was timeless, all matter would have quantum-tunneled their stable bounds too\u00a0given infinite time, resulting in the disintegration of all states and structures an eternity\u00a0ago. This would be so regardless of infinite matter.<\/p>\n<p>3. If the universe was infinite, (in accordance with my father&#8217;s &#8220;Universal Matter\u00a0Architecture&#8221; theory making GTR obsolete) every single point in space would be subject to\u00a0instantaneous &amp; infinitely intense gravitational force from every possible direction since\u00a0eternity (unless there is a cosmic horizon-limit to gravity&#8217;s reach), yielding null\u00a0gravitational force on the whole only in case of actual points, while tearing up all three\u00a0dimensional structures and forbidding coagulation of material bodies of even infinitesimal\u00a0sizes.<\/p>\n<p>4. If it could be suggested that new matter is generated sporadically to stimulate the energy-wise dying medium, then the whole of space would have been filled to the brim with matter an\u00a0eternity ago.<\/p>\n<p>5. If it could be suggested that matter is put in and taken out sporadically, either of two\u00a0contradictory scenarios would be true at the same time: A: Universe would have filled to the\u00a0brim an eternity ago. B: Universe would have emptied an eternity ago. At least everything\u00a0should have irreversibly tipped over to one side.<\/p>\n<p>6. If there was limitless matter at all in the universe, there would be an infinite number of\u00a0every person&#8230; A monistic timeless unending cosmos with countless matter (protons, electrons,\u00a0whatnot) in it directly implies that there existed\/exists\/will exist not only an infinite\u00a0number of everybody and everything, but also infinite instances (histories) of everything\u00a0throughout (child you, teenager you, adult you, senior you, etc&#8230;) during the flux of all\u00a0relativistic events. The probability of another version of someone existing every instant\u00a0within the same time-flow and the same &#8220;thought configuration&#8221; is at maximum in such a universe\u00a0model. Hence, an infinite number of flashes and sparks of anybody&#8217;s mind everywhere would\u00a0result in the totality of sensation: total white-out in the vision, total frequency surge in\u00a0the ear at maximum decibels, total taste explosion in the mouth, total sensations on the skin,\u00a0etc&#8230; Everybody would know everything there is to know, see, hear, touch, smell, etc&#8230; and\u00a0indeed be paralyzed by such an &#8220;explosion of synaesthesia&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>7. Finally, how can the human mind (which is supposedly &#8220;made up of matter only&#8221;) conjure\u00a0images and thoughts that defy the laws of physics in a universe operating in accordance with\u00a0the laws of physics? Should one say that human consciousness is just some special organization\u00a0of matter and nothing more, howcome it can conjure up irrational thought in a universe that is\u00a0governed solely by physical laws? We DO NOT observe, for example, a rock or a chair to embody\u00a0within it a representation of the outside world that defies physics. Unlike this, living beings\u00a0&#8211; humans in this case &#8211; are capable of fantasies and &#8220;irrational&#8221; thinking. A child can believe\u00a0in Santa Claus; people can believe in the resurrection of Christ; Muslims and Jews can believe\u00a0in Moses splitting the waters of the Red Sea with his staff; China and India have incredible epic tales; Ancient Greeks have their amazing mythology; Merlin the magician does fabulous feats in the Legend of Camelot&#8230;\u00a0These defy\u00a0the established laws of the cosmos. How is it that a brain supposedly composed simply of matter\u00a0&amp; energy can contain a representation of the outside world that defies the conditions and\u00a0boundaries of that world? It is a paradox to claim that a materialist-monist universe may yield\u00a0a human mind that can conceptualize dreams and fantasies that defy the physics out of which it supposedly arose (cf. &#8220;<a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Cartoon_physics\" target=\"_blank\">cartoon\u00a0physics<\/a>&#8220;).<\/p>\n<p>Therefore, all these paradoxes prohibit a timeless, endless, infinite content monist world. The\u00a0only solution is that the material universe is limited in age and content and that our reality is at\u00a0least dualistic.<\/p>\n<p><em>Dr. Ozan Yarman (2012-2013)<\/em><\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter\" title=\"The Observed Universe\" src=\"https:\/\/ozanyarman.com\/wpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/01\/Observable_universe_logarithmic_illustration_lowres.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"643\" height=\"643\" \/><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>-Eternity Paradoxes by Dr. Oz.- 1. If the universe was timeless, all matter would have dissipated into space an eternity ago\u00a0due to the 2nd law of Thermodynamics in action, resulting in the maximization of entropy,\u00a0hence, complete saturation of all available &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/ozanyarman.com\/wpress\/eternity-paradoxes\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":174,"parent":0,"menu_order":2,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-135","page","type-page","status-publish","has-post-thumbnail","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ozanyarman.com\/wpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/135","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ozanyarman.com\/wpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ozanyarman.com\/wpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ozanyarman.com\/wpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ozanyarman.com\/wpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=135"}],"version-history":[{"count":28,"href":"https:\/\/ozanyarman.com\/wpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/135\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":137,"href":"https:\/\/ozanyarman.com\/wpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/135\/revisions\/137"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ozanyarman.com\/wpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/174"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ozanyarman.com\/wpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=135"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}